|
The Free Congress Commentary
The Next Conservatism #21
Where Are We In Politics?
By Paul M. Weyrich
December 12, 2005
In one of the early columns in this series,
I pointed out that, if we look back over the last thirty or
forty years, we see that the Left won the culture war while
we conservatives won politically. It is true that we won politically,
in the sense of winning elections. Republicans now control
the White House and both Houses of Congress, something we
could not have even dreamed about forty years ago. But to
assess where conservatives are in politics today, we have
to look beyond just winning elections.
The question is do we have power? Not power
for ourselves but power for the common good. I would venture
that while we have influence, we often lack power. And as
my old colleague Howard Phillips used to teach there is a
profound difference.
I have been here while the Democrats controlled
the White House and both Houses of Congress (Lyndon Johnson,
Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton). I have also seen Republicans
in the White House but Democrats controlling the Congress.
(Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43. In his case the
Democrats controlled the Senate for a year and a half.) and
I have seen a Democrat in the White House with Republicans
controlling the Congress (Clinton) and now for the past several
years Republicans controlled not only the White House but
the Congress.
We should be in political heaven with this
development. The first time this has happened in more than
50 years. If we really had power, then, our ideas and programs
would be front and center. We should be well into a period
of having adopted them and now we should be concerned with
their implementation. The fact is most of our programs and
ideas are dead on arrival. In some cases the President has
proposed good ideas only to see them sink in the Congressional
cesspool. In other cases, the President won't buy into our
ideas. We plead them in the Congress but we often don't get
very far.
Yes, we have influence. In some cases the
White House worries about offending their base. The same with
Congress. So often we are able to stop bad ideas.
Why is this the case? The fact is we have
no horse. To the extent our ideas advanced in the past it
was because we first had Senator Barry Goldwater. Granted,
Goldwater later turned out to be something other than a conservative
on a lot of issues. But his initial "Conscience of a
Conservative" advanced our ideas and made our views legitimate.
The Goldwater campaign involved then actor Ronald Reagan.
His speech on national television again advanced our views.
Then he ran and was elected Governor of California. After
he served two terms, during which he continued to advance
our views, he ran for President. Although he failed to defeat
President Gerald Ford in 1976, that run set him up to be the
heir apparent in 1980.
Reagan's election, and with him a Republican
Senate and enough Republicans to form a conservative coalition
in the House, advanced our ideas. Tax cuts worked. So did
the President's objective of bringing down the Soviet Union.
Most conservatives never believed that was possible. While
the Reagan Administration did not see all of our ideas enacted
into law, still he made issues such as vouchers popular and
these issues have lived far beyond his Administration. He
also made legitimate our view that federal courts have to
be reigned in.
While George Herbert Walker Bush continued
some ideas advanced by President Reagan, his advocacy of the
largest tax increase in US history, after he had pledged "Read
my lips. No new taxes." ruined his Presidency. Now Bush
'41 has been more open to some of our ideas, but his unwillingness
to veto spending bills, the immigration issue which he has
not tackled and for some the war in Iraq has meant that he
is not the standard bearer of the conservative movement.
We have a number of able Senators, at least
a couple of whom could become the standard bearer of the conservative
movement. Right now, however they have not stood out among
their colleagues. For the most part they have not exercised
leadership. We do have a couple of promising Governors. Again,
while they have done well in their states, they have not exercised
national leadership.
I used to believe that the movement could
advance on the basis of ideas alone. We were the first to
come up with cultural conservatism. We pushed the idea that
political correctness was ruining the nation. Yes, these ideas
did catch on in the conservative movement. But we failed to
go beyond the movement because we have no standard bearer
who openly advances our ideas.
Our movement in some ways is much stronger
now than it was even in 1980. At least the social issues part
of our movement is much larger than it was when Ronald Reagan
became President. The economic part of our movement, however,
is not as strong. And the defense/foreign policy part of our
movement all but disappeared after the end of the Cold War.
It is being reinvigorated now as conservatives realize the
threat from the radical Muslims. While ideas are powerful
and sometimes they generate action, there is
no chance of actually advancing our agenda absent a national
figure who will get a following and who can eventually be
nominated for President and elected to that office.
For the first time in 2008 we do not have
a logical heir to our movement. There are plenty of candidates
who plan to run but so far none has caught fire. We run the
danger of splitting our support between candidates and thus
permitting a liberal to win. If we expect to have power to
advance our ideas then we need to get behind a single candidate
provided that candidate promises in blood that our people
will be appointed by him. Otherwise we will just continue
to have influence, but most likely not enough influence to
actually see our ideas become law. Can we find a suitable
standard bearer for 2008? It will prove difficult but if we
don't this movement may find itself completely on the outside
looking in.
Paul M. Weyrich is the Chairman and CEO
of the Free Congress Foundation.
|